What the work looks like.

Examples of what each stage produces: a Blueprint, an annual Stewardship Report and a Live-Fire exercise report, with three client scenarios and a plain statement of who is responsible for what.

Every example on this page is illustrative. The scenarios are composites, and names, jurisdictions, figures and details have been changed or invented so that no client can be identified. They show the shape and depth of the work, not advice for any particular situation, and they are not a promise of any outcome.

Three client scenarios.

Illustrative composites. Fees shown are Autark's professional fees only; third-party costs are additional and passed through at cost.

01

Sovereign Wealth Architecture · Illustrative

The founder who moved

A founder sold a company and relocated with their spouse to the UAE. Most of the proceeds sit with one private bank in Switzerland. There is a holiday property in Spain, a small portfolio with a US broker, and a will written under the law of the country they left, before the move.

The problems

  • Over 70 per cent of liquid wealth with a single institution, which had already asked twice for updated source-of-funds evidence
  • A will that no longer reflected their residence, and no plan for the Spanish property or the US account
  • Powers of attorney that would not be accepted by two of the institutions involved

The proposed solution

  • A foundation holding a single holding company, with a second banking relationship in another jurisdiction
  • Wills aligned in the two jurisdictions that matter, and a separate arrangement for the property
  • A continuity protocol so the spouse can act if the founder cannot

Scope

Architect, USD 5,500. Build quoted at USD 34,000 across four workstreams. Stewardship Standard, USD 6,000 a year.

02

Bitcoin Succession · Illustrative

The early holder

A long-term Bitcoin holder keeps most of their net worth on a single hardware wallet, with the seed phrase stamped on steel in two locations. Their partner is not technical. Their children are minors. Nobody else knows the full arrangement.

The problems

  • A single key: one loss or compromise is final
  • On death, whoever finds a backup gains factual control, with no legal title and no instructions
  • No mechanism for incapacity, and nothing to protect minor heirs

The proposed solution

  • A multisignature wallet with the holder's keys at two sites in different countries, and a timelocked recovery path
  • Recovery settling into a trust-owned company, with a professional trustee and a trusted friend as recovery key-holders
  • A written heir procedure that requires no one in the family to handle a key

Scope

Bitcoin Succession Blueprint, USD 5,500. Build quoted at USD 24,000. Stewardship Premium, with two Live-Fire exercises a year, quoted at USD 19,500 a year.

03

Sovereign Wealth Architecture · Illustrative

The family in three countries

Parents in Portugal, adult children in the United Kingdom and Canada. A family trading company, three rental properties, and investment accounts in the parents' joint names. One parent signs everything.

The problems

  • All authority in one person, with no successor director or signatory
  • Three succession regimes that had never been considered together
  • No agreement within the family on who would run the company

The proposed solution

  • A holding structure separating the trading company from the passive assets
  • Successor directors, a protector, and a written family charter for decisions
  • Coordinated wills, and a staged plan for passing the company

Scope

Architect, USD 12,500, reflecting the wider family and an operating company. Build quoted at USD 46,000. Stewardship Standard with one escalation test, quoted individually.

01 Architect

A Blueprint excerpt.

Two short extracts from a Blueprint for scenario 01. A full Blueprint runs to 25 to 40 pages across the seven sections set out on the Architect page.

Resilience Blueprint · Client A · Sections 1 and 3Illustrative · Anonymised

1. Summary of findings

DimensionGradeFinding
Jurisdictional exposureExposedOver 70 per cent of liquid assets subject to one jurisdiction's enforcement and reporting regime.
Custody structureExposedOne institution holds operating cash and investments. No second relationship able to receive funds within 30 days.
CompartmentalisationWatchAll assets held personally. Low current liability exposure, but none separated from future business risk.
Liquidity under stressWatchAdequate liquidity overall, concentrated in one channel.
Concentration and continuityExposedWill drafted under the law of the former residence; no recognised authority for the spouse to act on incapacity.

3. Scenario test: incapacity of the principal

HoldingTodayAfter the redesign
Swiss bank accountFrozen pending a court-appointed representative. Estimated four to nine months.Foundation council acts under its by-laws. Expected days, not months.
US brokeragePower of attorney not accepted in its current form.Held through the holding company; directors act.
Spanish propertyNo one able to sell or let.Separate arrangement with a local power of attorney in recognised form.

Timeframes are estimates based on stated assumptions about institutional practice, set out in an appendix. They are not guarantees.

03 Stewardship · Standard

An annual Stewardship Report.

The report a Standard client receives each year, shortened. It records what was checked, what changed and what should happen next.

Stewardship Report · Client A · Year 1Illustrative · Anonymised

Changes during the year

  • Principal's elder child turned 18 and was onboarded under the successor procedure
  • One foundation council member resigned; replacement appointed and registered
  • New reporting obligations took effect in one of the structure's jurisdictions; the holding company's filings were updated

Monitoring log

ObligationDueStatus
Holding company licence renewalMarchCompleted
Foundation annual returnJuneCompleted
Bank KYC refresh, second institutionSeptemberCompleted
Will review following change of residence of a beneficiaryOpenRecommended

Annual assessment

The structure remains appropriate for the principal's circumstances. One item of drift: the US brokerage account, scheduled for migration in the Build, was not moved and remains in the principal's personal name.

Recommended for next year

  • Complete the brokerage migration (quote attached)
  • Update the will in the second jurisdiction
  • Consider a Live-Fire incapacity exercise before the principal's planned year abroad

03 Stewardship · Premium

A Live-Fire exercise report.

A shortened report from a multisignature recovery exercise for scenario 02. Every exercise report sets out its objectives, its findings and the remediation that follows.

Live-Fire Exercise Report · Client B · Exercise 2Illustrative · Anonymised

Objectives

  • Confirm that the two recovery key-holders can complete the recovery path using the written procedure alone
  • Confirm that the trustee accepts the recovery instruction in the form the instruments require
  • Measure the time from trigger to completed recovery

Method

Recovery carried out on a test network wallet mirroring the live wallet's policy. No live funds were moved. Autark observed by video and did not see, receive or record any key material. The principal was not present, by design.

Findings

StepResultObservation
Key-holders located their devices and backupsPassedBoth within 24 hours.
Wallet software restored from backupPassed, with observationsOne key-holder's device needed a firmware update not covered by the procedure; delay of two hours.
Recovery transaction signed and broadcastPassedCompleted on the second attempt.
Trustee accepted the recovery instructionFailedThe trustee's new compliance officer required a certified copy of a document not in the key-holder pack.

Remediation

ActionOwnerBy
Add firmware update steps to the recovery procedureAutark2 weeks
Add a certified copy of the deed of appointment to each key-holder packTrustee, with Autark4 weeks
Re-test trustee acceptance onlyAutark and trustee8 weeks

Limits of this exercise

This exercise tested the recovery path under the conditions described, on the date it was run. It did not test the live wallet, the principal's own keys, or any court or regulatory process. It shows how the arrangement performed; it does not guarantee future access to any asset.

Who is responsible for what.

A structure involves several parties, each with its own duties. Our role is to design the whole, direct its build and keep it coherent. We do not take over anyone else's duties.

PartyResponsible forNot responsible for
AutarkDesigning the structure, selecting and directing providers in the Build, drafting within our competence, coordinating across jurisdictions, monitoring and testing under StewardshipHolding assets or keys, managing investments, acting as trustee, or giving local-law and tax opinions outside our qualifications
Trustee or foundation councilHolding legal title to trust or foundation assets and administering them under the deed or charter and local lawThe design of the wider structure, or assets held outside the vehicle
Local counselFormal opinions and specialist drafting under their own law, on our instructions and yoursHow their part fits into the structure as a whole
Tax advisersTax advice and filings in the jurisdictions where you or the structure are taxableStructural, succession and custody design
Banks and custodiansHolding and moving assets, and their own compliance decisionsWhether the structure around the account works
Registered agentsCorporate filings, registered office and statutory recordsAdvice on the structure
You and your key-holdersHolding your keys and devices securely, keeping us informed of changes, and taking part in exercisesKnowing the law or the technology: the procedures are written so that you do not have to

Find out what your own
Blueprint would cover.

The Snapshot takes about five minutes and asks for no account numbers or balances. Where your assets exceed USD 5 million, it leads into a free 30-minute qualifying call and, where we can help, a proposal for Standing Counsel or a fixed-price Blueprint.